Bugs and Buds - Trying out the Olympus 60mm f2.8 Macro lens
I have wanted a decent macro lens for some time because, from past experience, I know that having one can open up an entirely new range of photography topics. But which one to choose? In the past I have had quite a bit of experience and fun with Canon's excellent 100mm macro but since I sold off all my Canon gear a couple of years ago, I have been left macro-less, if that's even a word.
Olympus has three macro lenses in its range: the M.Zuiko Digital ED 30mm f3.5 Macro ($420 approx), the M.Zuiko ED 60mm f2.8 Macro (approx $600) and the $1,700 M.Zuiko Digital ED 90mm f3.5 Macro IS Pro. Bearing in mind that macro shooting can be mostly a slow process, because you need to spend additional time on focus, depth of field selection, plus engaging camera settings like Olympus's anti-shock feature used to correct shutter impact. I eventually decided against the Pro Macro offering because of cost, about $1000 more than the 30mm lens. Panasonic also retails a macro lens - the LUMIX G series Leica 45mm f2.8 Macro at around $800. Even so I thought the 60mm Olympus lens was a good compromise - its 120mm focal length gives you a perfect reach for most subjects.




















Comments